Spyic remotely gets every single bit of data that you need from your companion's gadget. There is no need to root your wife's phone, as well. However, the app runs in the background using stealth mode technology without being detected.
How accurate is speed on life360 app install#
In this case, since only 3 km/h is involved, drawing attention to the accuracy of the police measuring device and explaining your GPS measurement may be enough to drop you down by those 3 km/h and into the lesser expensive speeding bracket.īeware being a GLP driver and using GPS as well.As for Android phones, you are required to install a 2MB lightweight Spyic app.
While you may be able to raise some doubt, it would be very difficult to refute police speed measurements. Where does that leave the average driver with all this? Not too far ahead. Using a roadside speed reader board as a comparison also has it's hazards. Yes, that's not a bad idea, but now we're left with the question of how accurate is your speedometer? Unless you can satisfy the court that both your speedometer and the comparison is accurate, we're not much further ahead. Now, you might think that comparing your device to the reading on your speedometer would be a good thing. I wonder how often these apps sample the speed and if it is reported as measured or averaged between samples. My dash cam also records my speed, but again, it's up to me to show it's accuracy as the manufacturer is of no help. She passed me off to their technical support for the app but they chose not to respond to my query. I telephoned their customer service and was told that the app was "really accurate." Unfortunately the lady really had no idea what that statement actually meant. I am aware that BelairDirect insurance requires the use of their AutoMerit app as part of their policy. They also did not respond to my request for information.
I use eDriving's Mentor app to monitor my driving.
A weaker signal will produce less accurate results." The creators of the Life360 app did not respond to my e-mail, but their web site says that their device speed is "reasonably accurate." Further "Accuracy is determined in large part by the strength of the signal and data connection to the app. So, if you intend to use GPS evidence to defend yourself, you would need to testify along the same lines for your GPS device. Radar had a long history of use and acceptance by the courts at that point in time. The officer testifies to being trained in it's use, that the device was tested and found to be operating as intended by the manufacturer and, at least when it was new, had compared speeds measured by the laser with ones taken at the same time with radar and found to be the same. The laser speed measuring device is actually a good example of this. The sitting judicial justice assigns weight to evidence like this by knowing it's accuracy and reliability. Their response was that the court did not accept the GPS evidence in defence.Īfter a bit of thought, I suspect that this is because the accused did not prepare the way for the evidence. This is actually a situation that I have discussed with current traffic enforcement officers in the recent past.
0 kommentar(er)
